Insights AR-AP
Credit Control Policy for UAE SMEs 2026: A Template Your Finance Team Can Adopt This Week
A UAE SME credit control policy template: credit limits, credit scoring, payment terms by buyer tier, a CFO sign-off matrix and the dunning cadence.

Key takeaways
- Credit control policy is the missing rulebook at plenty of UAE SMEs — without it the dunning cadence and stop-supply trigger have no authority
- Credit-limit framework scales assessment effort to exposure: trade reference at AED 0-50k, bank reference + statements at AED 50-250k, full credit assessment above AED 250k
- Payment terms by buyer tier — net 30 SME private sector, net 60 mid-market, net 90 GREs and developers, COD or advance for new buyers without trade reference
- CFO sign-off matrix sets thresholds: finance manager up to AED 50k, CFO up to AED 250k, owner above AED 250k for limits, discounts and write-offs
- Stop-supply trigger at day 60 must be enforced in the ERP, not left to commercial team judgement
- FTA bad debt relief under Article 64 of Federal Decree-Law No. 8 of 2017 needs six months, a write-off in the books and written notice to the buyer
Short answer: a UAE credit control policy is a short written rulebook covering credit limits by exposure tier, payment terms by buyer type, deposits, a day-60 stop-supply trigger, a sign-off matrix and a dunning cadence — signed by the owner so the finance team has authority to enforce it.
A credit control policy for a UAE SME is the rulebook that turns ad-hoc receivables work into a controlled process. Plenty of UAE SMEs run without one. They pay for the gap every time a difficult buyer pushes back on a stop-supply, the commercial director argues for a limit exception, or the owner gets dragged into a payment-plan call that the finance manager should have handled. Drafting and enforcing that policy is core accounts receivable management in the UAE — the commercial discipline this template turns into a document your finance team can sign off this week.
This template is written for owners, managing directors, CFOs and finance managers of UAE SMEs in the AED 5-80 million revenue band, in Dubai, Sharjah, Abu Dhabi and the northern emirates alike. It covers what a credit control policy is, the six areas it has to cover, the credit-limit framework that scales assessment to exposure, the payment-terms grid by buyer type, the CFO sign-off matrix, and the operational details that decide whether the policy lives in the business or on a shelf: credit scoring, stop-supply triggers, exception process, annual review. The policy also sets the house position on payment terms — net 30 versus net 60 — so the terms grid is negotiated from a rule rather than conceded case by case.
Why a written credit control policy matters
Without a written policy, a UAE SME finance manager cannot really enforce the stop-supply trigger. The reason isn’t a missing data point or absent paper authority. It’s that there’s no written policy to point to when the commercial director protests. Every difficult conversation defaults to ad-hoc judgement, the relationship argument wins, and the cadence collapses. Tight credit control also keeps the debtor book clean enough to qualify for invoice financing from UAE providers, which lenders price on the quality of the receivables.
A two-page policy, signed by the owner and visible to the commercial team, changes that conversation from personal judgement to documented rule. It is also a clean illustration of the difference between finance and accounting: the ledger records what happened, and the policy decides what happens next. The finance manager doesn’t defend the trigger anymore. The policy does.
Day 1
when a written credit control policy starts paying back — the first difficult conversation it removes
The policy is also a key audit item. UAE auditors increasingly test that credit controls are documented and operating effectively, particularly for SMEs in continuous net-receivable positions where IFRS 9 expected-credit-loss provisioning materially affects the financial statements.
The UAE rules the policy has to sit inside
A credit control policy is a commercial document, but three UAE regimes constrain it, and knowing the exact wording stops the policy from promising something the law does not allow.
| What constrains the policy | The rule, as written | Primary source | Last verified |
|---|---|---|---|
| VAT falls due on the earlier of invoice or payment, not on collection | Tax is calculated on the date of supply, the earliest of transfer, completion of service, or “the date of receipt of payment or the date on which the Tax Invoice was issued” | Art. 25, Federal Decree-Law No. 8 of 2017 on VAT | 4 Aug 2026 |
| The VAT you charged is payable before the buyer pays you | The Tax Return “must be received by the Authority no later than the 28th day following the end of the Tax Period concerned”, and payable tax settled by the same date | Arts. 62 and 64, Cabinet Decision No. 52 of 2017 (VAT Executive Regulation) | 4 Aug 2026 |
| Standard VAT period length | ”The standard Tax Period applicable to a Taxable Person shall be a period of three calendar months ending on the date that the Authority determines” | Art. 62, Cabinet Decision No. 52 of 2017 | 4 Aug 2026 |
| VAT can be recovered on a bad debt, but only on conditions | Four cumulative conditions, including “More than six (6) months has passed from the date of the supply” | Art. 64, Federal Decree-Law No. 8 of 2017 | 4 Aug 2026 |
| Receivables write-offs are deductible only if they meet the general rule | ”Expenditure incurred wholly and exclusively for the purposes of the Taxable Person’s Business that is not capital in nature shall be deductible” | Art. 28, Federal Decree-Law No. 47 of 2022 on Corporate Tax | 4 Aug 2026 |
| Some costs are never deductible | Fines and penalties other than compensation for damages or breach of contract, bribes, dividends, corporate tax itself and recoverable input VAT | Art. 33, Federal Decree-Law No. 47 of 2022 | 4 Aug 2026 |
| Corporate tax return timing | ”no later than (9) nine months from the end of the relevant Tax Period” | Art. 53, Federal Decree-Law No. 47 of 2022 | 4 Aug 2026 |
The first two rows are the reason credit control is a cash issue in the UAE rather than a bookkeeping one. Under Article 25, the tax point lands on the earlier of the invoice date and the payment date. Under Article 64 of the VAT Executive Regulation the return and the payment are due by the 28th day after a three-month tax period. Put together, a UAE business that invoices on day 1 of a quarter and is paid on day 120 has already funded the FTA out of its own working capital by day 118.
Six areas the policy has to cover
A complete UAE SME credit control policy covers:
- Credit-limit framework — how new buyers are credit-assessed by exposure tier
- Payment terms by buyer type — standard terms by buyer category, exception process
- Deposit and milestone billing — for project-based work, advance percentages and retention rules
- Hold-supply trigger — at what days-past-due commercial supply stops
- CFO sign-off matrix — authority levels for limits, discounts and write-offs
- Dunning cadence template — five-stage escalation aligned to UAE buyer norms
The policy itself is typically 4-8 pages — short enough that the commercial team will actually read it, which matters more than completeness. The credit-scoring matrix, dunning template library and exception log live as appendices.
| Policy section | Length that works | Who has to sign it | Who has to read it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Purpose and scope | Half a page | Owner | Everyone in sales and finance |
| Credit-limit framework | 1 page plus tier table | Owner and CFO | Sales manager, finance manager |
| Payment terms grid | 1 page | Owner and CFO | Every salesperson |
| Deposits and milestones | Half a page | CFO | Project managers |
| Stop-supply trigger | Half a page | Owner | Sales manager, ERP administrator |
| Sign-off matrix | 1 page table | Owner | Finance manager, CFO |
| Dunning cadence | 1 page plus appendix | CFO | Collections owner |
| Appendices — scoring matrix, letter library, override log | As needed | CFO | Finance team |
Area 1: setting credit limits
The credit-limit framework scales assessment effort to exposure. The principle: low exposure deserves light assessment; high exposure requires full diligence.
| Tier | Credit limit band | Assessment required | Approver | Working days to approve |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 | AED 0 - 50,000 | Trade licence or free-zone licence verification, one confirmed trade reference, owner and manager contacts | Sales manager and finance manager | 2 |
| Tier 2 | AED 50,000 - 250,000 | Tier 1 plus bank reference, two trade references, latest management accounts | CFO on finance manager recommendation | 5 |
| Tier 3 | AED 250,000 - 500,000 | Tier 2 plus two years of audited financial statements, three trade references | CFO with owner notification | 10 |
| Tier 4 | Above AED 500,000 | Tier 3 plus an Al Etihad Credit Bureau report on the owner or PIC where relevant | Owner on CFO recommendation | 10 |
Tier 1 — AED 0 to 50,000 credit limit
Assessment requirements:
- Commercial registration and licence verification (mainland trade licence, free-zone licence, or GRE registration as applicable)
- One trade reference confirmed (existing supplier email confirmation of payment behaviour)
- Owner/manager name and contact details
Standard initial limit: AED 25,000 unless higher specifically requested Approval: Sales manager + finance manager Time to approve: 2 working days
Tier 2 — AED 50,000 to 250,000 credit limit
Assessment requirements:
- Tier 1 requirements plus:
- Bank reference (last 6 months of statements or bank confirmation letter)
- Two trade references from existing suppliers
- Latest unaudited management accounts (for businesses below AED 50m revenue)
- Management sign-off (CFO or finance director)
Standard initial limit: 25-50% of the buyer’s average monthly purchase volume across the supplier base Approval: CFO with finance manager recommendation Time to approve: 5 working days
Tier 3 — AED 250,000+ credit limit
Assessment requirements:
- Tier 2 requirements plus:
- Last two years of audited financial statements
- Three trade references
- Al Etihad Credit Bureau report on the owner/PIC where applicable
- Bank reference letter
- Owner sign-off (for limits above AED 500,000)
Standard initial limit: Determined case by case from financial-statement analysis — typically current ratio, days receivable, gearing and profitability trend Approval: Owner with CFO recommendation Time to approve: 10 working days
Limit increase process
Existing buyers can request limit increases after a clean payment history of 6-12 months. The increase request follows the same tier structure based on the proposed new limit (not the increment).
Area 2: payment terms by buyer type
Invoice payment terms should match buyer risk and UAE market norms, and the policy should name them explicitly rather than leaving each salesperson to negotiate. Two conventions are worth defining once so nobody has to ask: net 15 payment terms mean the full amount falls due 15 days from the invoice date, and 30 day payment terms — net 30 — mean 30 days from the same starting point. Say in the policy whether your clock starts at invoice date or delivery date, because that single line settles most of the disputes that otherwise reach the finance manager. Whatever you choose, print the payment terms on invoice documents themselves; terms agreed in an email and absent from the invoice are the ones that get argued about at day 60.
| Buyer type | Standard terms | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| New buyer (any tier) | COD or 50% advance | First three orders |
| SME private sector (after trade history) | Net 30 | Mainland LLC, free-zone company |
| Mid-market corporates | Net 45-60 | Annual revenue AED 50m-500m |
| Large corporates | Net 60 | Annual revenue above AED 500m |
| Government-related entities and major developers | Net 90 against PO | Retention per contract |
| Free-zone-to-free-zone B2B | Net 30-45 | DMCC, JAFZA, DAFZA |
| Government direct procurement | Per contract | Often net 90+ with retention |
| Export to GCC | LC or advance | Net 30 only with established history |
| Export outside GCC | LC or advance | Per buyer market |
Exception requests follow the CFO sign-off matrix (Area 5). For project-based work, the standard terms above apply to recurring spend; milestone billing rules apply to project deliverables.
Because the tax point under Article 25 of Federal Decree-Law No. 8 of 2017 does not wait for collection, every step down that table costs real cash. The next table prices it.
| Invoice value | Terms | VAT at 5% | Days the business funds the VAT before collection, on a quarter ending in the invoice month | Working capital tied up in the invoice at 8% annual funding cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AED 100,000 | Net 30 | AED 5,000 | Around 28 days after quarter end | AED 658 over 30 days |
| AED 100,000 | Net 60 | AED 5,000 | Around 28 days after quarter end | AED 1,315 over 60 days |
| AED 100,000 | Net 90 | AED 5,000 | Around 28 days after quarter end | AED 1,973 over 90 days |
| AED 500,000 | Net 60 | AED 25,000 | Around 28 days after quarter end | AED 6,575 over 60 days |
| AED 500,000 | Net 90, paid at day 140 | AED 25,000 | VAT already paid roughly 112 days before collection | AED 15,342 over 140 days |
Worked illustration. VAT rate of 5% from Article 3 of Federal Decree-Law No. 8 of 2017; the 28-day return and payment deadline from Article 64 of Cabinet Decision No. 52 of 2017. The 8% funding cost is an assumption for illustration, not a quoted UAE rate — substitute your own facility pricing.
The bottom row is the argument to put in front of a commercial director. On an AED 500,000 invoice that drifts to 140 days, the business has already handed AED 25,000 of VAT to the Federal Tax Authority months before the buyer pays, and carried the whole balance besides.
Area 3: deposits and milestone billing
For project-based businesses (consulting, IT services, construction, engineering, fit-out), the policy specifies the deposit and milestone billing structure:
Deposit on engagement letter / PO acceptance:
- Consulting and professional services: 25-50% of total fee
- IT services / software development: 30-50%
- Construction and fit-out: 10-30% mobilisation advance
- Equipment supply with installation: 30-50% on PO, balance against delivery + commissioning
Milestone billing structure:
- Defined deliverables with sign-off triggers
- Milestone invoices issued within 2 working days of buyer sign-off
- Final 10-15% retention released against handover and warranty period as per contract
Retention release:
- Construction and fit-out: 5-10% retention typically released 6-12 months after handover, subject to defects rectification
- Equipment supply: warranty retention as per contract terms
The policy specifies that milestone invoices follow the standard dunning cadence (Area 6) from due date, with retention release triggered by the contractual conditions rather than the standard cadence.
One VAT point belongs in this section rather than buried in the tax appendix. Article 26 of Federal Decree-Law No. 8 of 2017 sets the date of supply for contracts with periodic payments or consecutive invoices as the earliest of the tax invoice date, the date payment is due as shown on the invoice, and the date payment is received — provided it does not exceed one year from provision of the goods or services. Milestone-billed UAE projects therefore create tax points on a schedule the finance team can predict, which is exactly what makes the cash forecast reliable.
Area 4: when to stop supply
The hold-supply trigger is the most powerful lever in the collection cadence. The policy specifies:
Trigger threshold: All invoices above AED 25,000 at 60 days past due (lower threshold for higher-risk buyers as determined by credit scoring).
Implementation: ERP hold on the customer account. The hold prevents new sales orders, delivery notes and invoices being raised against the buyer until released.
Notification: Formal email to buyer’s finance contact and commercial contact on the day the hold is applied, copying the buyer’s owner/CEO for invoices above AED 100,000.
Release conditions:
- Full settlement of all overdue balances, OR
- Written payment plan signed by the buyer’s CFO or owner and countersigned by your own CFO, using the template in the dunning cadence library
Override:
- Commercial team cannot override informally
- Override requires CFO written approval
- All overrides logged in the credit policy review file for annual policy review
| Override log field | Why it is on the form |
|---|---|
| Buyer name and account code | Lets you count repeat offenders at the annual review |
| Invoice numbers and AED value held | Sizes the exposure the override released |
| Days past due at override | Shows whether the trigger is being bent early or late |
| Commercial reason given | Distinguishes a genuine contract dispute from a sales push |
| Approver and date | Makes accountability personal rather than departmental |
| Outcome — paid, part paid, written off | The only field that tells you whether overrides work |
The day-60 trigger is the policy’s teeth. If commercial overrides become routine, buyers learn the cadence is theatre and the entire credit policy loses authority.
For the full dunning cadence including the stop-supply trigger language, see our dunning letter template library.
Area 5: who signs off on what
The CFO sign-off matrix sets authority levels for credit decisions, settlement discounts and write-offs. Authority must be written so it cannot be challenged in difficult conversations.
Standard UAE SME matrix (calibrated to AED 30m revenue business):
| Decision | Finance manager | CFO | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|
| New buyer credit limit Tier 1 (≤AED 50k) | Approve | Notify | Notify |
| New buyer credit limit Tier 2 (AED 50k-250k) | Recommend | Approve | Notify |
| New buyer credit limit Tier 3 (>AED 250k) | Recommend | Recommend | Approve |
| Existing buyer limit increase up to 25% | Approve | Notify | Notify |
| Existing buyer limit increase 25-100% | Recommend | Approve | Notify |
| Existing buyer limit increase above 100% | Recommend | Recommend | Approve |
| Payment terms exception within standard | Approve | Notify | Notify |
| Payment terms exception beyond standard | Recommend | Approve | Notify |
| Settlement discount up to 5% | Approve | Notify | Notify |
| Settlement discount 5-15% | Recommend | Approve | Notify |
| Settlement discount above 15% | Recommend | Recommend | Approve |
| Write-off up to AED 25k | Recommend | Approve | Notify |
| Write-off AED 25k-100k | Recommend | Recommend | Approve |
| Write-off above AED 100k | Recommend | Recommend | Approve |
| Stop-supply trigger override | Recommend | Approve | Notify |
| Bad-debt write-off + VAT bad-debt relief claim | Recommend | Approve | Notify |
The thresholds scale with business size. Use the table below rather than re-arguing the numbers every time the business grows.
| UAE SME revenue band | Tier 1 limit ceiling | Write-off ceiling for the CFO | Settlement discount ceiling for the finance manager |
|---|---|---|---|
| Below AED 15 million | AED 25,000 | AED 12,500 | 3% |
| AED 15 - 50 million | AED 50,000 | AED 25,000 | 5% |
| AED 50 - 100 million | AED 100,000 | AED 50,000 | 5% |
| Above AED 100 million | AED 200,000 | AED 100,000 | 7% |
Area 6: the dunning cadence
The policy specifies the standard dunning cadence. The full template library, with letters in English and Arabic, lives in the dunning letter template guide and is referenced from the policy as an appendix.
Summary cadence:
| Day past due | Stage | Format |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Cordial reminder | Email (automated) |
| 14 | Courtesy call | Phone |
| 21 | Firm reminder | Email (automated) |
| 30 | Statement + finance manager escalation | |
| 45 | Commercial escalation | Email to senior contacts |
| 60 | Stop-supply trigger | Email + ERP hold |
| 75 | Final demand letter | Formal letterhead |
| 90 | Legal referral | Referred to UAE-licensed law firm |
Two numbers tell you whether the cadence is working. The DSO formula is straightforward — closing trade receivables divided by credit sales for the period, multiplied by the number of days in that period — and the days sales outstanding ratio it produces is the headline measure of how long your money sits with customers. Alongside it, accounts receivable turnover, calculated as credit sales divided by average trade receivables, expresses the same relationship as a number of times per year rather than a number of days. The trade receivables turnover ratio and DSO always move in opposite directions, so track one and you have both.
Run the ageing report monthly and put it in front of whoever owns collections. An ageing report that nobody reviews is a spreadsheet; one reviewed line by line at a standing meeting is a collections process. Aged debt that has quietly passed 90 days is the balance most likely to become a write-off, and it rarely appears without warning in an ageing that someone was actually reading.
For the supporting DSO improvement plan, see our days sales outstanding improvement guide, and for what good looks like in your sector, the accounts receivable turnover and DSO benchmark comparison by industry. For the underlying AR ageing diagnostic, see the accounts receivable ageing playbook.
Scoring a UAE buyer before you ship
Credit scoring produces a rating that drives credit limit, payment terms and assessment frequency. A workable UAE SME methodology:
Internal indicators (weight 60%):
- Average days-to-pay over last 12 months (weight 30%)
- Dispute frequency — disputes raised per 100 invoices (weight 10%)
- Returned cheque history — count over last 24 months (weight 10%)
- Credit limit utilisation pattern — average vs peak (weight 10%)
External indicators (weight 40%):
- Commercial registration validity, licence type, years in operation (weight 10%)
- Audited financial statement health — current ratio, gearing, profitability trend (weight 15%, only for Tier 2+ buyers)
- Bank reference quality (weight 5%)
- Al Etihad Credit Bureau report (weight 5%, where applicable)
- Trade references (weight 5%)
Output rating:
| Rating | Score band | Action |
|---|---|---|
| A | 85-100 | Full standard terms, annual review |
| B | 70-84 | Standard terms with semi-annual review |
| C | 55-69 | Tighter terms (e.g. net 15 instead of net 30), quarterly review |
| D | 40-54 | COD or 50% advance, monthly review |
| E | <40 | Do not trade or full advance only |
The scoring matrix is calibrated annually against actual 12-month collection performance — if A-rated buyers are missing payment dates, the matrix is mis-weighted and needs adjustment.
One UAE-specific check belongs in every Tier 2 and above assessment: confirm the buyer’s trade licence is current with the issuing authority, whether that is the Dubai Department of Economy and Tourism, the Abu Dhabi Department of Economic Development, the Sharjah Economic Development Department or the relevant free zone registrar. An expired or suspended licence on a buyer you are about to ship AED 300,000 of goods to is the cheapest red flag you will ever find, and it takes two minutes.
Wiring the policy into IFRS 9 expected credit losses
IFRS 9 requires the SME to provision for expected credit losses on all trade receivables at each reporting date. The credit policy’s credit-scoring output feeds the ECL provision matrix directly:
| Credit rating | Stage 1 ECL on current AR | Stage 2 ECL on 30+ past due |
|---|---|---|
| A | 0.25% | 2% |
| B | 0.5% | 4% |
| C | 1.5% | 8% |
| D | 4% | 15% |
Plus standard ageing-bucket overlays for all ratings:
- 61-90 days: 8%
- 91-180 days: 25%
- 180+ days: 60%
UAE auditors increasingly test that the credit scoring and ECL matrix are integrated and calibrated to realised losses. The annual policy review is the standard moment for this calibration.
Note the vocabulary here, because it varies between accountants and confuses owners reading their own accounts. What the ECL matrix produces is a provision for bad debts — an estimate of the receivables you do not expect to collect, held against the balance rather than removing it. A bad debt write-off is the later step, taken when a specific balance is judged uncollectable. On the balance sheet, trade receivables, sometimes labelled sundry debtors in older UAE chart-of-accounts templates, sit as a current asset net of that provision.
Receivables and payables are reported separately and never offset against each other, even where the same counterparty appears on both sides. Where the business bills in advance, the mirror-image balance is deferred revenue - cash collected for work not yet done, which sits as a liability rather than as sales. The mechanics of the journal itself are set out in our guide to the provision for bad debts accounting entry.
The paperwork the FTA needs for VAT bad debt relief
This is a section many UAE credit policies get wrong, usually by citing the wrong instrument. The rule sits in Article 64 of Federal Decree-Law No. 8 of 2017 on Value Added Tax, not in the Executive Regulation, and all four conditions are cumulative.
| Condition in Article 64(1) | The text, as written | What the policy has to produce |
|---|---|---|
| (a) Supply made and tax paid | ”Goods and Services have been supplied and the Due Tax has been charged and paid” | The original tax invoice and the return in which output tax was declared |
| (b) Written off in the books | ”Consideration for the supply has been written off in full or part as a bad debt in the accounts of the supplier” | The write-off journal, with the approval per the sign-off matrix |
| (c) Six months elapsed | ”More than six (6) months has passed from the date of the supply” | An ageing extract dated at the claim, showing the supply date |
| (d) Buyer notified | ”The Registrant supplier has notified the Recipient … of the amount of Consideration for the supply that has been written off” | The written notification, with proof of sending |
| Amount of the adjustment | The reduction “shall be equal to the Tax related to the Consideration which has been written off” | A calculation reconciling the claim to the written-off amount, not the gross invoice |
Source: Article 64 of Federal Decree-Law No. 8 of 2017 on Value Added Tax. Last verified 4 August 2026.
There is a mirror obligation worth knowing about, because it changes how a buyer reacts to your notification letter. Article 64(2) requires a registrant recipient to reduce its own recoverable input tax where the supplier has reduced output tax, the recipient has received the notification, the input tax was deducted, and the consideration has gone unpaid for over six months. Your write-off notification therefore creates a VAT consequence at the buyer’s end. In practice, a meaningful number of overdue UAE accounts settle at that point rather than absorb it.
The credit policy should specify that:
- Write-offs above AED 25,000 require CFO approval, per the Area 5 matrix
- Write-offs above AED 100,000 require owner approval
- The bad-debt-relief working paper is prepared quarterly from the 180+ ageing bucket
- The buyer-notification letter — which can be the day-90 legal referral letter, the final demand or a separate write-off notification — is filed with the write-off journal entry
Lining the policy up with the 28-day VAT cycle
Under Article 62 of Cabinet Decision No. 52 of 2017, the standard tax period is three calendar months, and under Article 64 the return and the payment are both due by the 28th day after that period ends. Output VAT on issued invoices is payable regardless of whether the invoice has been collected.
| Quarter end | VAT return and payment due | Invoice raised 5 days into the quarter, net 90 | Days the VAT is funded before collection |
|---|---|---|---|
| 31 March | 28 April | Due around 4 July | About 67 days |
| 30 June | 28 July | Due around 3 October | About 67 days |
| 30 September | 28 October | Due around 3 January | About 67 days |
| 31 December | 28 January | Due around 5 April | About 67 days |
Illustrative timeline built from Articles 62 and 64 of Cabinet Decision No. 52 of 2017. Confirm your own assigned tax period on EmaraTax — the Federal Tax Authority may assign a shorter or longer period under Article 62(2).
The credit policy’s payment terms framework should be calibrated to this constraint. UAE SMEs in continuous net-payable VAT positions — most trading businesses — need tight payment terms to avoid funding the FTA out of overdraft. SMEs in net-refund positions, most exporters, can offer more generous terms because the VAT timing flow funds part of the working capital gap. For the underlying mechanics, see our VAT registration guide.
When a cheque bounces
A returned cheque is the strongest single signal a UAE credit policy will ever receive about a buyer, and the policy should treat it as a rating event rather than an administrative annoyance.
The credit policy specifies returned-cheque handling:
- Day 0 (cheque returned): same-day email and phone call requesting immediate replacement
- Day 3: formal letter on letterhead, returned cheque attached
- Day 7: referral to legal counsel
- Account automatically moved to COD or advance for the next 12 months minimum
- Credit rating downgraded by one grade (for example B to C); two returned cheques in 24 months trigger an E rating and trade suspension
On the legal side, cheque enforcement in the UAE has changed materially in recent years, and the practical route in ordinary insufficient-funds cases now runs through the civil execution process rather than a criminal complaint. We have not set out article numbers here because we are an accounting and advisory firm, not a law firm, and the enforcement position turns on facts we would be guessing at. Confirm the current route, the documents required and the likely timeline with a UAE-licensed law firm or the UAE Ministry of Justice before the policy commits you to a step you cannot take.
The annual credit policy review
The credit control policy is reviewed annually, ideally aligned to the audit cycle:
Review scope:
- Credit-scoring matrix calibration against actual 12-month collection performance
- Payment-terms benchmark against UAE sector norms, especially when the cash conversion cycle has moved
- Sign-off threshold review against business growth
- Regulatory updates across FTA VAT rules, UAE Corporate Tax and IFRS 9 methodology
- Dunning cadence performance review
- Stop-supply trigger overrides log review
Output:
- Updated policy document with version number and effective date
- Owner sign-off on material changes
- Communication to finance and commercial teams
- Updated dunning templates and ERP configuration as required
| Review input | Where the number comes from | What a bad answer looks like |
|---|---|---|
| Realised loss rate by rating band | Write-offs in the year divided by average AR in that band | A-rated buyers producing losses at all |
| Weighted average days to pay | Collections ledger for the last 12 months | Drift of more than 10 days year on year |
| Override count and value | The override log from Area 4 | More than one override per month |
| 90+ ageing bucket as a share of AR | Monthly ageing report | Above 15% of total AR |
| VAT bad debt relief claimed | The quarterly working paper | Zero claimed while write-offs exist |
| Limit utilisation breaches | Weekly AR review exception report | Repeat breaches by the same buyer |
Material changes mid-year — an acquisition, a new buyer segment, a regulatory change — require a policy amendment with owner sign-off.
Rolling the policy out in one week
The policy fails more often in the rollout than in the drafting. This is the sequence that works.
| Day | Action | Owner |
|---|---|---|
| Monday | Pull the current AR ageing, the last 12 months of collections and the top 20 buyers by exposure | Finance manager |
| Tuesday | Draft the credit-limit tiers and payment-terms grid against that actual buyer base | CFO |
| Wednesday | Set the sign-off matrix thresholds against the revenue band table above; owner reviews | Owner and CFO |
| Thursday | Configure the ERP — credit limits, 80% utilisation alert, day-60 hold, dunning emails | ERP administrator |
| Friday morning | Brief the commercial team, not by email — walk them through the stop-supply trigger and the exception route | CFO |
| Friday afternoon | Owner signs, version 1.0 dated, circulated to finance and sales | Owner |
| The Monday after | First weekly AR review under the new policy | Finance manager |
Where UAE SMEs trip themselves up
One common failure is writing the policy and then not enforcing it. The document goes on a shelf, the cadence drifts, and the team goes back to deciding each case on the day. Another is setting the thresholds too low for the size of the business. An AED 50k write-off needing owner approval makes sense at AED 10m revenue; at AED 60m it’s just a bottleneck on the owner’s calendar, and a bottleneck is where overdue accounts go to sit unactioned.
Then there’s the failure to connect the two halves of the policy — approving Tier 3 limits on a D-rated buyer because the commercial team pushed hard for the sale, which defeats the point of scoring the buyer at all. Letting commercial overrides become routine does the same damage from the other direction: once overrides are normal, the stop-supply trigger and the sign-off matrix stop meaning anything.
Two more are worth naming. A policy that ignores ECL provisioning and bad-debt-relief documentation isn’t aligned to IFRS 9 and the FTA’s Article 64 conditions, and that gap shows up later as audit findings and delayed tax recovery. And treating the whole thing as a finance document is a mistake, because credit control is really a commercial discipline — the sales team, the commercial director and the owner all need to be in the briefing and the annual review, not just copied on it.
When to bring in outside help
Most UAE SMEs benefit from advisory support on credit policy when one or more of the following is true:
- No written credit policy exists today
- The current policy is outdated — more than two years since review
- Stop-supply triggers are routinely overridden
- The 90+ AR bucket exceeds 15% of total AR
- Audit has flagged inadequate credit controls or IFRS 9 ECL methodology
- The business is preparing for investment, a bank facility renewal or a sale where receivables quality will be diligenced
Typical AR/AP advisory engagements include the policy drafting, credit-scoring matrix construction, sign-off matrix calibration, briefing of finance and commercial teams, integration with the dunning cadence and weekly AR review meeting, and annual policy review on the audit cycle.
For owners wanting a CFO-level review across credit policy, AR/AP and the wider working-capital cycle, see our CFO advisory page and the working capital playbook.
How Velmont Crest helps
Velmont Crest drafts and rolls out credit control policies for UAE SMEs as part of our accounts receivable and payable management and CFO advisory work. Typical engagements include:
- Policy diagnostic of the current state — often no written policy exists at all
- Draft policy aligned to the FTA’s VAT rules, UAE Corporate Tax and IFRS 9
- Credit-scoring matrix construction calibrated to the SME’s actual buyer base
- CFO sign-off matrix sized to the SME’s revenue and risk tolerance
- Dunning template library in English and Arabic — see the dunning letter guide
- Briefing of finance and commercial teams
- Configuration of the cadence in Zoho Books, QuickBooks Online or Xero
- First-quarter facilitation of the weekly AR review meeting
- Annual policy review on the audit cycle
- Integration with the wider accounting and bookkeeping cycle
This is advisory and accounting support — Velmont Crest is a DED-licensed accounting and advisory firm, not a licensed debt-collection agency or financial-services entity. Legal recovery and litigation are referred to UAE-licensed law firms.
To discuss your current credit control set-up and where the gaps are, get a quote or message the team on WhatsApp.
Disclaimer: Velmont Crest is a DED-licensed accounting and advisory firm providing preparation and compliance support services. We are not a law firm, an FTA-registered tax agent, or a licensed debt-collection agency. VAT, Corporate Tax and commercial-law positions change and turn on specific facts — verify current requirements with the Federal Tax Authority, the UAE Ministry of Finance and a qualified professional before acting.
References
- Federal Tax Authority — VAT legislation, including Federal Decree-Law No. 8 of 2017 (Article 64, Adjustment for Bad Debts)
- Cabinet Decision No. 52 of 2017 — VAT Executive Regulation (PDF)
- Federal Decree-Law No. 47 of 2022 on the Taxation of Corporations and Businesses (PDF)
- UAE Government Portal — Taxation
- Federal Tax Authority
Frequently asked questions
- What is a credit control policy, and why does a UAE SME need one?
- It's the written rulebook for how you extend credit, set payment terms, chase overdue invoices and pull the plug on supply when a buyer won't pay. Without one, every awkward conversation falls back on someone's judgement in the moment — the commercial team protects the relationship at the expense of cash, finance has no authority to escalate, and the owner gets dragged into every payment fight. A two-page policy the owner has signed turns all of that from a personal argument into a documented rule the sales team can see.
- What should be in a UAE SME credit control policy?
- Six areas, really. The credit-limit framework — how new buyers get assessed by exposure tier, the standard limit per category, and how a limit increase gets requested. Payment terms by buyer type — net 30 for SME private sector, net 60 for mid-market, net 90 for GREs and developers. Deposit and milestone rules for project work. The hold-supply trigger — the days-past-due point where supply stops. The CFO sign-off matrix — who signs off limit exceptions, settlement discounts and write-offs. And the dunning cadence — cordial at day 7, firm at day 21, commercial escalation at day 45, final demand at day 75, legal review at day 90.
- How should credit limits be set for UAE buyers?
- Scale the effort to the exposure. Up to AED 50,000, a single confirmed trade reference and a commercial-registration check is enough. From AED 50,000 to 250,000, add a bank reference and management sign-off on top of that. Above AED 250,000, you want the last two years of financial statements, multiple trade references, a bank reference, an Al Etihad Credit Bureau pull where it applies to that buyer type, and CFO sign-off. The opening limit usually lands around 25-50% of the buyer's average monthly purchase volume across its supplier base, and increases get earned the boring way — a clean 6-12 month payment record.
- What payment terms should a UAE SME offer different buyer types?
- Match the terms to the risk and to what the market actually expects. A brand-new buyer of any size gets cash-on-delivery or 50% advance for the first three orders — no exceptions early on. SME private sector, net 30. Mid-market, net 45 to 60. Large corporates, net 60. The government-related giants and the big mainland developers will want net 90 against PO with retention per contract, and you generally take it. Free-zone-to-free-zone B2B sits around net 30 to 45; GCC exports lean on a letter of credit or advance for first orders. Spell out the standard term and the exception route, and stick to it.
- What is a CFO sign-off matrix, and what thresholds work for UAE SMEs?
- It's the grid that says who can approve what — credit decisions, settlement discounts, write-offs. A workable UAE SME structure runs roughly like this. A limit increase up to 25%, the finance manager approves and the CFO is just notified; 25-100%, the finance manager recommends and the CFO approves. Settlement discounts up to 5% sit with the finance manager, 5-15% with the CFO. Write-offs up to AED 25k go to the CFO; AED 25k-100k, the CFO recommends and the owner approves; above AED 100k, the owner signs, with audit-committee notification where one exists. Writing it down is the whole point — nobody gets to argue the authority mid-call.
- How does credit scoring work for UAE SME buyers?
- It blends what you already know about a buyer with what you can find out from outside. Internally, you're looking at average days-to-pay over the last 12 months, how often they dispute invoices, any returned cheques, and how hard they push their limit. Externally — commercial registration and licence type, years trading, audited financials (above the AED 250k limit), the quality of the bank reference, an Al Etihad Credit Bureau report where it's relevant, and trade references from existing suppliers. That feeds an A/B/C/D rating, which in turn drives the limit, the payment terms and how often you re-check them. Anything below a D either pays COD or advance, or you don't trade with them at all.
- When does the credit policy require Al Etihad Credit Bureau input?
- AECB mostly covers individual credit, plus some commercial data, so it earns its keep when you're extending real money to a sole-proprietor or owner-run business and the owner's personal profile genuinely tells you something about the risk. For corporate buyers — LLCs, free-zone companies past a threshold — the policy usually calls for an AECB pull on the owner or PIC once the limit clears AED 500,000, alongside the corporate financials. The per-report fee is a rounding error against the exposure.
- How should the credit policy handle the day-60 stop-supply trigger?
- The day-60 stop is the strongest lever you've got in the whole cadence, so the policy has to nail down four things: the threshold (usually any invoice above AED 25,000 at 60 days past due), how it's enforced (an ERP hold, not somebody's judgement on the day), the notification (a formal email to the buyer's finance and commercial contacts), and what releases it (full settlement, or a written payment plan with CFO sign-off). And it has to say in plain words that the commercial team can't quietly wave the hold through — any override needs the CFO's written approval and gets logged for the annual review. The moment overrides become casual, the trigger stops meaning anything.
- How often should a UAE SME review its credit control policy?
- Once a year as a full review, and ideally on the audit cycle so the policy is current the moment the audit team starts testing your credit controls. Walk through the credit-scoring matrix against your actual 12-month collection record, benchmark the payment terms against your sector, and re-check the sign-off thresholds against how much the business has grown — AED 50k thresholds set when you were a AED 10m business are nonsense once you're at AED 50m. Fold in any regulatory shifts and a look at how the dunning cadence is actually performing. Anything material that changes mid-year gets its own amendment with owner sign-off.
- What is accounts receivable, and are debtors a current asset?
- Accounts receivable is the money customers owe you for goods or services you have already delivered and invoiced but not yet been paid for. Older UAE chart-of-accounts templates label the same balance trade debtors or sundry debtors — the terms describe the same thing, and trade receivables and debtors are used interchangeably in practice. Yes, they are a current asset: they sit on the balance sheet under current assets because they are expected to convert to cash inside the normal operating cycle, usually twelve months. They are reported net of the provision for expected credit losses, so the figure you see is what the business realistically expects to collect rather than the gross invoiced amount. Receivables and payables are shown separately and are not offset.
- When can a UAE business claim VAT back on a bad debt?
- Article 64 of Federal Decree-Law No. 8 of 2017 sets four conditions and all of them have to be met. The goods or services must have been supplied and the due tax charged and paid. The consideration must have been written off in full or in part as a bad debt in the supplier's own accounts. More than six months must have passed from the date of the supply. And the registrant supplier must have notified the recipient of the amount of consideration written off. The reduction you take is the tax relating to the amount written off, not the whole invoice. Keep the write-off journal, the notification and the ageing extract together in one working paper.
- Does the credit control policy affect our UAE corporate tax position?
- Indirectly but genuinely. Article 28 of Federal Decree-Law No. 47 of 2022 allows a deduction for expenditure incurred wholly and exclusively for the purposes of the business that is not capital in nature, and Article 33 lists what is never deductible — fines and penalties other than contractual damages, bribes, dividends, corporate tax itself, and recoverable input VAT among them. A documented credit policy, a calibrated provision matrix and a clean write-off approval trail are what turn a receivables charge into a position you can support in the tax return rather than one you argue about later.
- How does a bounced cheque change the credit decision in the UAE?
- Treat it as a rating event, not a collections detail. A returned cheque tells you more about a UAE buyer's liquidity than a month of ageing does, so the policy should move the account to cash on delivery or advance for at least twelve months, downgrade the credit rating by one grade, and put two returned cheques inside twenty-four months on the do-not-trade list. On the legal side, cheque enforcement in the UAE changed materially in recent years and the route now runs through the civil execution process rather than a criminal complaint in ordinary insufficient-funds cases. Confirm the current position and your options with a UAE-licensed law firm — we are not one.
- Does Velmont Crest draft credit control policies for UAE SMEs?
- Yes — drafting and rolling out credit control policies is part of our [accounts receivable and payable management](/services/accounts-receivable-payable-management/) and [CFO advisory](/services/cfo-advisory/) work. A typical engagement starts with a diagnostic of where you are today (often: no written policy at all), then a draft built around the FTA rules, IFRS 9 and UAE commercial practice. From there we construct a credit-scoring matrix calibrated to your real buyer base, size a CFO sign-off matrix to your revenue and risk appetite, brief both the finance and commercial teams, wire it into the dunning cadence and the weekly AR review, and set the annual review on your audit cycle.
Filed under: credit control policy, credit control, credit policy template UAE, credit limit framework, AR-AP management, CFO sign-off matrix, payment terms UAE, credit scoring SME
Published · Updated



